Global Environmental problem ” and Global Leadership

Final Essay

Criteria Description Weight LOs
Presentation Global Environmental issues in General
The Problem Selected ‘’Carbon Dioxide emission’’
Figures, size, tables, facts of the problem
CATWOE and root causes of the problem (5 Why’s or fishbone analysis)
Factors contributing to Carbon Dioxide emission becoming a global problem.
What If these causes are not addressed, what will/can happen?

10%
Argument 
development Impact of the Carbon dioxide emission Globally, and locally (middle east) on
Environment life with figures, tables, facts
Health with figures, tables, facts
Social with figures, tables, facts
Economy with figures, tables, facts
2.1 Has the role of leadership in the creation/magnifying the problem has been discussed?
2.2 Critically evaluate Carbon Dioxide emission issue and the extent to which they are caused by the actions of humanity, contemporary decision-making methods, inappropriate focus, and business paradigms.
20% LO1
Problem analysis: Impact of Leadership 3.0 Use Pareto Analysis steps or any other theory to identify the problem and to find a development strategy using the known theories such as Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma to find solution
3.1 How was the Implications on the organisation been clearly identified? Has the problem/gap been identified and evidenced appropriately (e.g., statistics, literature, etc.) and/or using adequate theoretical concepts (e.g., Root Cause analysis)?
3.2 Has the Leadership or Mis leadership influenced and impacted magnifying /solving the problem, was it also investigated?

25% LO2
Strategy and 
implementation 4.1 Use one of the common theories to develop a comprehensive improvement strategy where you discuss in details leadership styles to extract the best style(s) that fit best. Theories like Mckinsey 7 framework, or Quality improvement Framework
For this part please access the net to find companies like Siemens, GE, Philips what did they do /provide to maintain sustainability and protect environment through equipment design such as Eco chillers, recycled equipment, less usage of plastic, …etc , you will find many articles about this in the internet
4.2 use SWOT analysis or similar to analyze the solution
4.3 Relevant leadership style(s) been identified using relevant theories and concepts and supported by evidenced arguments (e.g., literature e.g.)?
4.4 Does the strategy consider the complexity of staffing issues motivation, influencing etc.)?
4.5 Risk mitigation plan

25% LO3
Conclusions and Reflection 5.0 Conclusion
5.1 Lesson learned (Depth of reflection and introspection regarding what has been learned. What worked well? What needs/needed revision (e.g., task, availability of information, choice of topic etc.)?
5.2 What your reaction learning about your leadership style? How will this affect your professional and personal life? 20% LO4
 
 

How your assessment is graded:
Mark Bands Outcome Generic Learning Outcomes (GLOs) (Academic Regulations, Section 2)
Knowledge & Understanding Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills
Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band 90-100% Achieves module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level Exceptional analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics with very clear originality and autonomy. Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument making an exceptional use of scholarly conventions. Demonstrates independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication Exceptional analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Exceptional research skills, independence of thought, an extremely high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, exceptional expressive/professional skills, and substantial creativity and originality. Exceptional academic/intellectual skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication
80-89% Outstanding analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics with clear originality and autonomy. Outstanding development of conceptual structures and argument making an exemplary use of scholarly conventions. Demonstrates independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency Outstanding analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   Very high-level development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Outstanding research skills, independence of thought, a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, outstanding expressive/professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality. Exemplary academic/intellectual skills
70-79% Excellent analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   Excellent development of conceptual structures and argument making excellent use of scholarly conventions.   Demonstrates independence of thought and a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency Excellent analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   High level development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Excellent research skills, independence of thought, a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, excellent expressive/ professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality. Excellent academic/intellectual skills, and considerable creativity and originality
60-69% Good analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   Development of conceptual structures and argument making consistent use of scholarly conventions Good analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics.   Development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions
50-59% Satisfactory knowledge of key issues/ concepts/ethics in discipline. Descriptive in parts but some ability to synthesize scholarship and argument.   Minor lapses in use of scholarly conventions Satisfactory knowledge of key issues/ concepts/ethics in discipline. Descriptive in parts but some ability to synthesise scholarship and argument.   Minor lapses in use of scholarly conventions
40-49% A marginal pass in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level Basic knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Generally descriptive, with restricted synthesis of existing scholarship and little argument. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent Basic knowledge of key issues/concepts/ethics in discipline. Generally descriptive, with restricted synthesis of existing scholarship and little argument. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent.