Manager and Leader

Critical Thinking Questions

Manager and Leader

Do some research and answer the following critical thinking questions from this week’s readings. In your analysis, cite a minimum of three (3) references from different sources (the textbook can be one source).

Explain the difference between someone who “manages” and someone who “leads.” Think of someone who you consider to be an effective leader. Now, explain why you consider him or her to be effective.
Deliberate over the importance of charisma in transformational leadership. Do you believe that people who are not overly charismatic can still be transformational leaders? Explain your point of view. Then, explain the action steps leaders can and should take to ensure that their transformational leadership is ethical.
Controlling is defined as monitoring performance, comparing it with goals, and taking corrective action as needed. Describe the reasons why control is a difficult managerial function. What are the challenges involved with controlling?

Your submission should be a minimum of two (2), double-spaced, full pages of analysis with proper reference citation per current APA guidelines.

Academic Integrity

Upon submission, your assignment will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin. Your paper will be checked against a database of millions of written works and provide feedback on originality. You may view your originality report; however, you will not be permitted to submit your paper a second time. Ensure your work is entirely your own and cite your sources, if applicable!

Submission

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number or description. Do not add punctuation or special characters to the file name. Submit your completed assignment as an attachment to your instructor through this activity.

Review the evaluation rubric for detailed grading criteria.

Rubric
MGMT 201 – 6.4 Critial Thinking Questions Rubric
MGMT 201 – 6.4 Critial Thinking Questions Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis
All ideas are clearly and logically related and supports prompts/thesis: transitions are clear and easy to follow. Fully supports and develops ideas with research.

60.0 pts
Superior (54 – 60 pts)

53.0 pts
Above Average (48 – 53 pts)

47.0 pts
Average (40 – 47 pts)

41.0 pts
Below Average (36 – 41 pts)

35.0 pts
Failure (0 – 35 pts)

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization
Introduction provides all necessary elements of information; sets clear expectations; conclusion is decisive, creates a fully satisfying sense of completion.

15.0 pts
Superior (14 – 15 pts)

13.0 pts
Above Average (12 – 13 pts)

11.0 pts
Average

10.0 pts
Below Average

9.0 pts
Failure (0 – 9 pts)

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Research and References
Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class and required two or more outside references (not including the course textbook) supporting the content. Quotes are less than 10% of the paper. In-text citations are used for support and clarity. Formatting of in-text citations and references must follow APA guidelines.

15.0 pts
Superior (14 – 15 pts)

13.0 pts
Above Average (12 – 13 pts)

11.0 pts
Average

10.0 pts
Below Average

9.0 pts
Failure (0 – 9 pts)

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing Mechanics
No major grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors and paragraphs always unified and coherent.

10.0 pts
Superior

9.0 pts
Above Average

8.0 pts
Average

7.0 pts
Below Average

6.0 pts
Failure (0 – 6 pts)

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0