analyzing and/or comparing one or more of the video documentaries listed. Special attention will be given to analyzing or criticizing the documentary. I
already know what they are about. Tell me what the investigators did wrong, got wrong, forgot to cover, misinterpreted, etc. Focus on the politics/policy
aspects of each respective documentary. Where are their errors/biases? In what ways is the documentary misleading? What have you gleaned from the
course readings, for example, that might allow you to assess the claims presented in the documentary more critically? What policy implications are
recommended by each documentary? Do you accept these recommendations? Why or why not?
VIDEO DOCUMENTARY: “Stealing the Atomic Bomb” (USSR)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpXWxgcP9Rs “Equinox: A Very British Bomb.”
(UK) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk_zpjK3cTo “Israel and the Nuclear Bomb”
(Israel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjO7PSffTHg “Raid on Iraqi Reactor”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFObTJxFuWI. “The Terror Trader – Pakistani
Rogue Scientist A Q Khan” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5AMrywjr1U
You can use the attached sources. or not.
For this short paper activity, you will learn about the three delays model, which explains…
Topic : Hospital adult medical surgical collaboration area a. Current Menu Analysis (5 points/5%) Analyze…
As a sales manager, you will use statistical methods to support actionable business decisions for Pastas R Us,…
Read the business intelligence articles: Getting to Know the World of Business Intelligence Business intelligence…
The behaviors of a population can put it at risk for specific health conditions. Studies…