Understanding Imperativeness of Online Exam Proctoring Acceptance in Corporate Con

Understanding Imperativeness of Online Exam Proctoring Acceptance in Corporate Context: Quantitative Study
PhD THESIS PROPOSAL- LITERATURE REVIEW

Contents
2 – Literature Review 3
2.0 – Introduction 3
2.1 – COVID-19 Pandemic: Issues and Challenges 3
2.1.1 – e-Learning and e-Exam (Online Exam) during Pandemic 3
2.2 – An Online Exam: An Overview 3
2.2.1 – E-Proctoring: Definition, Issues & Challenges 3
2.2.2 – eProctoring in Organization: Academic vs Corporate 3
2.3 – Technology Acceptance & Adoption 3
2.3.1 – Related Theories: A Review 3
2.3.2 – Intention to Use: A Summary 3
2.4 – Factors for intention to use eProctoring 3
2.4.1 – Privacy factor 3
2.4.2 – Autonomy 3
2.4.3 – Perceived Compatibility 4
2.4.4 – Accountability 4
2.4.5 – Transparency 4
2.5 – Selected factors and Theories 4
2.5.1 – Underpinning theory & Factor A for Corporate eProctoring 4
2.5.2 – Underpinning theory & Factor B for Corporate eProctoring 4
2.6 – Summary 4

2 – Literature Review

2.0 – Introduction

2.1 – COVID-19 Pandemic: Issues and Challenges
2.1.1 – e-Learning and e-Exam (Online Exam) during Pandemic

2.2 – An Online Exam: An Overview
2.2.1 – E-Proctoring: Definition, Issues & Challenges
2.2.2 – eProctoring in Organization: Academic vs Corporate

2.3 – Technology Acceptance & Adoption
2.3.1 – Related Theories: A Review
2.3.2 – Intention to Use: A Summary

2.4 – Factors for intention to use eProctoring
2.4.1 – Privacy factor

2.4.2 – Autonomy

2.4.3 – Perceived Compatibility

2.4.4 – Accountability

2.4.5 – Transparency
….continue review all relevant factors

2.5 – Selected factors and Theories
2.5.1 – Underpinning theory & Factor A for Corporate eProctoring
2.5.2 – Underpinning theory & Factor B for Corporate eProctoring
….continue select best theory and factor for Corporate eProctoring

2.6 – Summary