Assessment Format: CW – Essay
Mode of Submission: Canvas: Assignment with Submission
Where your assessment requires you to submit work to Canvas or an External Tool, it is not recommended to submit via the Canvas App due to some limitations in the App functionality. We would suggest instead that submission is made on a browser from a computer or mobile device.
It is not recommended that you submit your assignment or take a quiz on a cellular or satellite connection. This is because loss of internet connection during assessment is most commonly associated with these services, although we understand that sometimes this is the only option. Wherever possible, we would recommend that assessments are submitted or undertaken on WiFi or hardwired (ethernet) connections.
Large files are best submitted on a hardwired internet connection (i.e., not WiFi).
Weighting: This assessment is worth 70% of the Module mark
Assessment Level: 7 Generic Assessment Criteria and Marking StandardsLinks to an external site.
Element Learning Outcomes: The element learning outcomes for this assessment are: 1,5
Marking Approach: Fine-graded
Feedback Release Date: 17/01/2023
Assessment Details
Assessment Task Detail and Instructions:
Element 012 Critical Evaluation and Reflection.
This element of the summative assessment requires you to produce a 1500-word critical evaluation of, and reflection on, your videoed teaching session. You are required to consider how the session met your intended learning outcomes and your students learning needs. You are expected to draw on theories of teaching and learning covered in this module relevant to your practice. As part of the reflection, you are expected to critically explore ways in which the session could have been improved and how what you have learnt will influence your future practice.
This assessment is fine graded and comprises 70% of your final module mark.
Rationale for assessment design:
This element has been specifically designed to help you demonstrate what you have learned about teaching and learning as a result of your experiences on this module. It is closely aligned with element 010, the teaching plan, and element 011, the teaching observation of this session, and you should use the feedback you received on these elements to inform this submission.
It is hoped the skills you develop in designing this session, and the feedback you receive, will be useful to you in your role as a practitioner in medical and healthcare education.
Links to module learning outcomes:
This assessment will allow you to demonstrate that you have met the following module learning outcomes:
LO1: Critically evaluate theories of learning, teaching and assessment and how they relate to professional practice.
LO5: Draw on a range of sources, including relevant educational literature and knowledge of education in their context, to reflect critically on the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrate how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners.
Links to course learning outcomes:
This assessment will allow you to demonstrate that you have met the following course learning outcomes:
A01: Critically analyse educational literature.
A02: Critically evaluate theories of learning, teaching and assessment and how they relate to their professional practice.
A03: Critically analyse the needs of their learners.
A04. Plan, and reflect on, effective learning sessions for their students, informed and guided by critical engagement with relevant educational literature and knowledge of their context.
B01: Deliver effective learning sessions, informed and guided by critical engagement with educational literature, and responding to reflections on their educational context.
B02: Reflect critically on the effectiveness of teaching and demonstrate how this can be used to enhance future practice to the benefit of learners.
Submission deadline for element 012 critical evaluation & reflection
Your final document must be uploaded on Canvas by 14:00 on Friday 9th December 2022.
Guidance Resources and Quick Links:
Academic skills workshops run throughout teaching weeks that provide help with getting started with an assignment, finding information, referencing, planning and structure, critical writing, and developing an academic writing style. Please see the link below, as a number of workshops are available and delivered online via Microsoft Teams. Study Skills PlusLinks to an external site.
Referencing methodLinks to an external site.
StudySkillsPlusLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.
Help and Support – Ask ARULinks to an external site.Links to an external site.
Submitting your work in CanvasLinks to an external site.
Re-Assessment Arrangements:
The information relating to re-assessment will be provided on re-assessment pages on Canvas.
MOD006274 Principles of Medical and Healthcare Education 012
MOD006274 Principles of Medical and Healthcare Education 012
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRelevance (20%)
The assessment question is interpreted correctly and answered appropriately. 20 Pts
Outstanding
An outstanding answer that fully engages the question and deals with each of its elements with a high level of intellectual rigour. 15 Pts
Excellent
An excellent answer that clearly understands the question and deals very well with each of its elements. 13 Pts
Good
A good answer that demonstrates an understanding of the question and deals well with each of its elements. 11 Pts
Satisfactorary
A reasonable answer that understands the overall question and sufficiently addresses its elements. 7 Pts
Limited
A limited answer that poorly understands and addresses the question. 0 Pts
Not addressed
The answer provided fails to address the question.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLearning Outcome 1 (30%).
Critically evaluate theories of learning, teaching and assessment and how they relate to professional practice. 30 Pts
Outstanding
An outstanding critical evaluation of key theories of learning, teaching and assessment, further enhanced by a rigorous and complete understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice. 22 Pts
Excellent
An excellent critical evaluation of key theories of learning, teaching and assessment, coupled with an excellent understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice. 19 Pts
Good
A good critical evaluation of key theories of learning, teaching and assessment, demonstrating a good understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice. 16 Pts
Satisfactorary
A satisfactory critical evaluation of important theories of learning, teaching and assessment, demonstrating a fair understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice 10 Pts
Limited
A limited evaluation of some theories of learning, teaching and assessment, demonstrating some understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice 0 Pts
Not addressed
No critical evaluation of key theories of learning, teaching and assessment or understanding of how these theories relate to professional practice
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLearning Outcome 5 (30%)
Draw on a range of sources, including relevant educational literature and knowledge of education in their context, to reflect critically on the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrate how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners. 30 Pts
Outstanding
Draws on an outstanding range of sources, including key educational literature and a thorough knowledge of education in their context. Demonstrates a high degree of criticality on the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrate how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners 22 Pts
Excellent
Draws on an excellent range of sources, including key educational literature and a robust knowledge of education in their context. Demonstrates an excellent critical view on the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrates how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners. 19 Pts
Good
Draws on a good range of sources, including important educational literature and knowledge of education in their context. Demonstrates a critical view on the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrates how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners. 16 Pts
Satisfactorary
Draws on a sufficient range of sources, including educational literature and some knowledge of education in their context. Demonstrates some degree of criticality around the effectiveness of their teaching and demonstrates how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners. 10 Pts
Limited
Draws on a limited number of sources, including educational literature and some knowledge of education in their context. Demonstrates a lack of a critical view on the effectiveness of their teaching and poorly demonstrates how they will use critical reflection to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners. 0 Pts
Not addressed
Draws on an insufficient number of sources and demonstrates no critical reflection or how they will use this to enhance their future practice to the benefit of their learners.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation and referencing (20%)
The submission is clearly presented, appropriately referenced and includes a reference list. 20 Pts
Outstanding
An outstandingly well-presented and formatted submission. Thorough referencing in the correct style and free of any errors in either citations or the reference list. 15 Pts
Excellent
Excellent presentation and formatting. Excellent referencing throughout in the correct style and free of significant errors. 13 Pts
Good
Well-presented and formatted overall. Correct referencing is used throughout, although with minor errors possible. 11 Pts
Satisfactory
Adequately presented and formatted, although with some areas for improvement. The submission is referenced but with some errors. 7 Pts
Limited
Poorly presented overall. References have been used but there are substantial errors or omissions. 0 Pts
Not addressed
Very poor presentation and/or references not provided.
20 pts
Total points: 100
For this short paper activity, you will learn about the three delays model, which explains…
Topic : Hospital adult medical surgical collaboration area a. Current Menu Analysis (5 points/5%) Analyze…
As a sales manager, you will use statistical methods to support actionable business decisions for Pastas R Us,…
Read the business intelligence articles: Getting to Know the World of Business Intelligence Business intelligence…
The behaviors of a population can put it at risk for specific health conditions. Studies…