Urban Sustainable Planning of Two Urban Regeneration Projects

details
– This is a two-part assignment. Please follow these instructions carefully. The aim of this group report is to
give a comparative analysis of the sustainability of one good project and one bad project. We have chosen
Royal Seaport Stockholm and Liverpool Waters respectively. Please Address the following points in relation
to the two urban regeneration programs in dedicated paragraphs. The First Part of the Assignment –> I
would like you to address the liveability (which is 1 of 4 criteria that of sustainability that our group has
chosen to evaluate sustainability) of both of these projects and analyse them individually. So, you’re the
format and write up would look like (i.e. Each paragraph will look like Good Project: People, Place, and
Social Equity. Bad Project: People Place, and Social Equity. Good Project: Affordability. Bad Project
Affordability. These two criteria (people place and social equity & affordability were both taken from the
LEED criteria of what makes a development sustainable. ALSO, you must NOT address the other group
members parts (don’t step on anybodies toes). Below are the other sections that you must make sure that
you DO NOT repeat or include in your section.
.
Planning Intentions
– Forward looking
– High quality public space
Energy Efficiency and climate responsibility
– Green Quality environment
– Highly efficiency energy for heating
Liveability (two person section)
– Compactness
– Mixed-use nature of project
– People, Place and Social Equity.
– Affordability
(Transport) Forward looking mobility
– Interplay and synergy of transport for both project
.
.
Second Part of the Assignment–>Please make yourself familiar with these projects and write 1 paragraph
explaining the projects. Each paragraph for this section should be 250 words long. Thanks