Assignment Paper

ENG 122 Summative Assessment Part One Guidelines and Rubric
Feedback and Revision Reflection
Overview: In this module, you learned about some different strategies for revising your writing. In this assignment, you will review your instructor’s feedback on
your writing plan and consider how you will incorporate that feedback to further develop your thoughts as you prepare to write your first draft of the critical
analysis essay.
Prompt: For this reflection assignment, you will make some choices about your approach to your critical analysis essay based on your understanding of revision
and the feedback on your writing plan provided by your instructor. You’ll also discuss who your intended audience is and what you hope to accomplish with your
essay.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed in at least two paragraphs (each paragraph should contain at least five sentences in order to
adequately address each element):
I. Feedback and Revision Reflection: Use this reflection to gather your thoughts and determine a strategy for writing your critical analysis essay based on
your instructor’s feedback on your writing plan.
A. Think about your experiences with revision in the past. What approaches to revision have worked well for you? [ENG-122-03] B. What revision strategy from the Module Five content would you like to try when revising your critical analysis essay? [ENG-122-03] C. Review your writing plan and the feedback provided by your instructor. How does this feedback influence your ideas about your selected
reading? [ENG-122-03] D. What changes will you make to your analysis now that you have received this outside feedback? [ENG-122-03] II. Audience: Use this part of your reflection to consider your audience and purpose.
A. Imagine that your essay will be read by an audience beyond your instructor. Identify an audience that might benefit from reading your essay and
describe some of this audience’s characteristics. [ENG-122-01] B. What potential challenges could you have connecting with this audience with your writing? [ENG-122-01] C. Identify some choices you can make within your writing to connect with this audience. [ENG-122-01] Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then,
check your writing for errors. Once you have proofread your document, submit it via the Summative Assessment Part One: Feedback and Revision Reflection
link in Brightspace
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Feedback and
Revision
Reflection:
Approaches to
Revision
[ENG-122-03] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
cites specific, relevant examples
of successful approaches
(100%)
Describes previous approaches
to revisions (85%)
Describes previous approaches
to revisions, but response is
unclear or cursory (55%)
Does not describe previous
approaches to revisions (0%)
11.25
Feedback and
Revision
Reflection:
Revision Strategy
[ENG-122-03] Identifies a new revision
strategy to implement based on
the Module Five content (100%)
Identifies a new revision
strategy to implement based on
the Module Five content, but
response is unclear or cursory
(55%)
Does not identify a new revision
strategy to implement based on
the Module Five content (0%)
11.25
Feedback and
Revision
Reflection:
Influence
[ENG-122-03] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates
considerable thought and
contemplation of the feedback
(100%)
Explains how the feedback from
the instructor influenced ideas
about the selected reading
(85%)
Explains how the feedback from
the instructor influenced ideas
about the selected reading, but
response is unclear or cursory
(55%)
Does not explain how the
feedback from the instructor
influenced ideas about the
selected reading (0%)
11.25
Feedback and
Revision
Reflection:
Changes
[ENG-122-03] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
cites specific, relevant examples
in support of the explanation
(100%)
Explains how the instructor’s
feedback changes the analysis
(85%)
Explains how the instructor’s
feedback changes the analysis,
but response is unclear or
cursory (55%)
Does not explain how the
instructor’s feedback changes
the analysis (0%)
11.25
Audience:
Audience
Characteristics
[ENG-122-01] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates a sophisticated
awareness of the audience’s
characteristics (100%)
Identifies the essay’s audience
and describes characteristics of
this audience (85%)
Identifies the essay’s audience,
but response is unclear,
cursory, or characteristics of
the audience is inaccurate
(55%)
Does not identify the essay’s
audience (0%)
15
Audience:
Challenges
[ENG-122-01] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates a sophisticated
awareness of the challenges
connecting with the audience
(100%)
Identifies potential challenges
in connecting with the intended
audience (85%)
Identifies possible challenges in
connecting with the intended
audience but response is
unclear or cursory (55%)
Does not identify potential
challenges in connecting with
the intended audience (0%)
15
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Audience: Choices
[ENG-122-01] Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides an insightful
connection between the
challenges posed and strategies
necessary to connect with the
audience (100%)
Identifies choices that could be
made within the essay to
connect with the intended
audience (85%)
Identifies choices that could be
made within the essay to
connect with the intended
audience, but response is
unclear or cursory (55%)
Does not identify choices that
could be made within the essay
(0%)
15
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format (100%)
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
(85%)
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas (55%)
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas (0%)
10
Total 100%